Appendix 12 – Animal Health and Welfare
This Appendix details the requirements for Health and Welfare training, monitoring, ablation-free sourcing and permitted stunning method usage, and methodologies to calculate the metrics on mortalities, antibiotic load and stocking density under Principle 4.
|
Section |
|---|
|
12.1 Introduction |
|
12.2 Training requirements |
|
12.3 Water quality monitoring requirements |
|
12.4 Ablation-free requirements |
|
12.5 Permitted stunning methods |
|
12.6 Methodologies |
12.1 Introduction
Aquatic animal health and welfare is highly context-specific, given the diversity of species and culture systems. This variability highlights the importance of adjusted approaches within the ASC Farm Standard, as maintaining health and welfare is key to ensuring sustainable and ethical aquaculture practices. To address this complexity, the tables below and methodologies outline requirements that must be implemented according to the specific scenarios and needs of different species and systems.
12.2 Training requirements
Table 1 below outlines the requirements for basic and advanced aquatic animal health and welfare training.
Table 1. Aquatic animal Health and Welfare Training Requirements
|
Indicator reference |
Audience |
Training level |
Training format |
Training frequency |
Content outline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4.1.1.1 4.1.1.14 4.2.1.1 |
All relevant employees |
Basic |
Theory |
During the onboarding period at the start of employment |
General aquatic animal health and welfare awareness training to inform about the importance of aquatic animal health and welfare, including biosecurity |
|
4.1.1.2 4.1.1.15 4.2.1.2 |
Any person involved in: Aquatic animal husbandry; or Aquatic animal handling, including slaughter and processing |
Advanced |
Theory and Practice |
Annual (refresher-courses shall incorporate advances/developments in the training subject matter) |
Basic anatomy and physiology of the species being farmed |
|
Advanced aquatic animal health and welfare assessment – this shall include all welfare Indicators in the ASC Farm Standard (morphological, behavioural, water quality, feeding, stocking density, disease recognition, mortality classification and necropsy forms) |
|||||
|
Handling |
|||||
|
Slaughter (harvesting) |
|||||
|
Biosecurity |
|||||
|
Data collection, logging and reporting systems |
|||||
|
Assessment of stunning and killing effectiveness |
|||||
|
Data collection, logging and reporting systems |
|||||
|
4.3.2.1 4.3.2.2 |
All relevant employees |
Advanced |
Theory and Practice |
During the onboarding period at the start of employment and then annually (refresher-courses shall incorporate advances/developments in the training subject matter) |
Biosecurity Disease recognition Handling Behaviour Feeding |
12.3 Water Quality Monitoring Requirements
Table 2 below outlines the water quality monitoring requirements for fish culture (including cleaner fish) in the various culture systems, water types and during live transport. Table 3 below outlines the water quality monitoring requirements for crustacean culture in the various culture systems and water types.
Table 2. Water quality monitoring requirements for fish culture and live transport (including cleaner fish) as required by Indicators 4.1.1.10.1, 4.1.1.26.1, 4.1.2.10, 4.1.2.24.
|
PARAMETERS |
TYPE OF CULTURE SYSTEM |
TRANSPORT |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Freshwater |
Brackish and Marine Water |
Live transport |
|||||||
|
Ponds |
RAS |
Cages |
Flow-through |
Ponds |
RAS |
Cages |
Flow-through |
||
|
Temperature |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
At the point of departure, during transport and on arrival |
|
Dissolved oxygen |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
At the point of departure, during transport and on arrival |
|
Turbidity |
Daily (for intensive systems) Risk assessed (for semi-intensive and extensive systems) |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily (for intensive systems) Risk assessed (for semi-intensive and extensive systems) |
Daily |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Risk assessed |
|
Carbon dioxide |
Biweekly (for intensive systems) Risk assessed (for semi-intensive and extensive systems) |
Daily |
Biweekly |
Biweekly (for intensive systems) Risk assessed (for semi-intensive and extensive systems) |
Daily |
Biweekly |
Risk assessed |
||
|
pH |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Biweekly (for intensive systems) Risk assessed (for extensive systems) |
Daily |
Risk assessed |
Biweekly |
Risk assessed |
|
Salinity |
Daily |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
||||
|
Ammonia/nitrite/nitrate |
Biweekly |
Daily |
Biweekly |
Biweekly |
Daily |
Biweekly |
Risk assessed |
||
|
Metals |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|||
|
Water flow/velocity |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|||||||
|
Hydrogen sulphide |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
||||
Table 3. Water quality monitoring requirements for crustacean culture as required by Indicator 4.2.1.8.1
|
PARAMETERS |
TYPE OF CULTURE SYSTEM |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Freshwater |
Brackish and Marine Water |
|||||
|
Ponds |
RAS |
Flow-through |
Ponds |
RAS |
Flow-through |
|
|
Temperature |
Twice a day148148Measured at dawn and dusk. |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
|
Dissolved oxygen |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
Twice a day |
|
Transparency |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|
Turbidity |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|
Carbon dioxide |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Fortnight |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Fortnight |
|
pH |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
Daily |
|
Salinity |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Weekly/Daily149149Daily monitoring during the rainy season. |
Daily |
Weekly/Daily150150Daily monitoring during the rainy season. |
|
Alkalinity and hardness |
Weekly |
Weekly |
Weekly |
Risk assessed |
Weekly |
Risk assessed |
|
Ammonia |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Fortnight |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Fortnight |
|
Nitrite |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Weekly |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Weekly |
|
Nitrate |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Fortnight |
Risk assessed |
Daily |
Fortnight |
|
Metals |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|
Minerals (Ca2+, K+, Mg2+) |
Weekly |
Weekly |
Weekly |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
|
Hydrogen sulphide |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
Risk assessed |
12.4 Ablation-free requirements
Table 4 below outlines the requirements for UoCs culturing Penaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon to progress towards sourcing entirely from ablation-free female broodstock.
Table 4. Sourcing requirements for UoCs culturing Penaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon, as required by Indicator 4.2.1.13.
|
Percentage of the production sourced from AF female broodstock |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sourcing requirements for UoCs151151These requirements are based on the original issue date of the ASC Farm Standard V1.0 in May 2025. |
Penaeus vannamei |
Sourcing requirements for UoCs151151These requirements are based on the original issue date of the ASC Farm Standard V1.0 in May 2025. |
Penaeus monodon |
|
Current sourcing requirement |
25% |
Sourcing requirement from May 2028 |
25% |
|
Sourcing requirement from May 2027 |
50% |
Sourcing requirement from May 2030 |
50% |
|
Sourcing requirement from May 2029 |
100% |
Sourcing requirement from May 2032 |
75% |
|
Sourcing requirement from May 2034 |
100% |
||
12.5 Permitted stunning methods
Table 5 below outlines the permitted stunning methods and usage requirements for UoCs for the various fish species.
Table 5. Species-specific permitted stunning methods and usage requirements for UoCs, as required by Indicators 4.1.3.4 and 4.1.3.12
|
Species |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Permitted stunning methods 152152ASC will review available stunning methods on a yearly basis, to make sure that any new developments that are considered suitable are incorporated into this list. |
Salmonids |
Wrasse |
Lumpfish |
Cod |
Seabass, Seabream, Meagre |
Pangasius |
Catfish |
Tilapia |
Seriola, Cobia |
Flatfish |
Tropical Marine Finfish |
|
Percussion (Automatic) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Turbot only |
✔ |
||||
|
Percussion (Manual153153Techniques such as ‘spiking’, or ‘ikejime’, or destruction of the medulla oblongata are acceptable.) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Electrical |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Anaesthetic |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Usage requirements for UoCs154154These requirements are based on the original issue date of the ASC Farm Standard V1.0 in May 2025. |
UoCs currently required to use permitted stunning methods |
UoCs required to use permitted stunning methods from May 2028 |
|||||||||
12.6 Methodologies
The methodologies below outline the formulae to calculate the metrics on mortalities, survival rates, antibiotic load and stocking density under Principle 4.
12.6.1
The mortality rate and real percentage mortality is calculated for each species in production at each site, as required by Indicator 4.1.1.6.
The mortality rate is calculated as the observed mortality count as a percentage of the stocking count:
The real percentage mortality is calculated as the difference between stocked and harvested animals divided by the stocked animals:
The survival rate for crustaceans is calculated for each species in production at each site, as required by Indicator 4.2.1.4.
The survival rate is calculated as the harvest count as a percentage of the stocking count:
12.6.2 The formula below outlines the methodology for antibiotic load calculation, as required by Indicator 4.4.16.
The antibiotic load is calculated for each species in production at each site and is the total amount of active component used from all applied antibiotics used divided by the net production volume.
12.6.3 The formulae below outline the methodologies for stocking density calculation, as required by Indicators 4.1.1.12, 4.1.1.27, and 4.2.1.11.
The UoC shall calculate stocking densities at the highest stocked volume or highest stocking count.
Depending on the species in production, the stocking density is reported as biomass per surface area (kg/m2), biomass per water volume (kg/m3) or number of aquatic animals per surface area (# aquatic animals/m2):
The water surface area of circular production units can be calculated as follows:
Where radius is calculated as:
The water surface area for rectangular production units can be calculated as follows:
The water volume can be calculated by multiplying the surface area with the height of the production units for circular and rectangular production units, respectively:
