Filter content
by selecting applicable filters below
Indicator 2.3.1
by Contact on 8 October 2026
Requirement
The UoC shall ensure the site has a low risk of Human-Wildlife Conflict within the site and in the area surrounding the site, as determined through the ERA (see Indicator 2.1.1).
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
Indicator 2.1.1 and Appendix 3.1 outline the site-specific Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) following the Standardised Risk Methodology.
-
Mitigation measures may need to be implemented to manage Human-Wildlife Conflict within the site and in the area surrounding the site.
-
The risk level and identified mitigation measures (if applicable) should be identified in the ERA.
Evidence of Implementation
-
The ERA assesses the risk of Human-Wildlife Conflict. Evidence should be presented to demonstrate whether the risk is low.
-
Mitigation measures implemented to manage Human-Wildlife Conflict to maintain the low risk level.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The ERA has assessed the risk of Human-Wildlife Conflict and determined the risk level is low.
-
Mitigation measures are implemented (if required and recommended by the ERA) to maintain the low risk level.
