Filter content
by selecting applicable filters below
Indicator 2.4.13
by Contact on 8 October 2026
Requirement
Indicator applicability: fish species with an EICAT Category MR/MV The UoC shall implement appropriate mitigation measures according to the contextualisation of the EICAT category, following the method outlined in Appendix 6 (6.2).
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
[Note]: Indicator 2.4.9 only applies for species/regions that are classified as ‘Category Major/Massive (MR/MV)’ in the EICAT Species Factsheet.
-
This Indicator requires that the UoC implements suitable actions to minimise the potential harm to biodiversity by a species, depending on its context as determined in Appendix 6 (following the decision-tree in this Appendix).
-
For situations in which either the species, the production region or the culture system results in a low likelihood of contributing to biodiversity harm, the UoC is not required to implement actions.
-
For situations in which either the species, the production region or the culture system contributes to biodiversity harm, the UoC is required to implement actions that reduce this risk. This could mean, e.g.:
-
Installation of net pens as per technical standards in order to further reduce the likelihood of escapes occurring.
-
Installation of additional screens or barriers in pond/tank culture to further reduce the likelihood of escapes occurring.
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
Documents demonstrating to what extent the decision tree in Appendix 6 is applicable, and evidence of a reduction in the harm category (where relevant).
-
In cases where a reduction in the harm category is not possible, the UoC should demonstrate which additional measures have been taken, including the intended outcome of these measures.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The outcome of the decision-tree results in Appendix 6.
-
In cases where a reduction in the harm category is not possible, confirmation that additional measures have been taken, including the intended outcome of these measures.
