Filter content
by selecting applicable filters below
Indicator 4.1.2.11
by Contact on 8 October 2026
Requirement
The UoC shall ensure that the HMP includes a visual inspection process to identify abnormal behaviour in relation to the handling activity and defines mitigation measures when identified.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
Visual inspection during handling should be included in the HMP.
-
When direct visual inspections are not possible (e.g. pangasius transportation) or considered invasive (e.g. during live fish transport inside a well), cameras can be used. Alternatively, fish behaviour can be assessed when loading and discharging the fish as a minimum requirement.
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
The monitoring process, that incorporates the corrective actions required, included in the HMP.
-
Records that confirm the monitoring of the behaviour.
-
A checked box on the monitoring records indicating whether monitoring behavioural took place or not is accepted.
-
-
Employees should demonstrate awareness of the established behavioural monitoring process.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The monitoring process included in the HMP that incorporates the corrective actions and is implemented.
-
Implementation can be verified by cross-checking the process with relevant records, information from employee interviews and observations.
Useful Resources
-
Bhadmus, Z. T. (2022) Effect of crowding on behaviour of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in aquaculture. Thesis; The Artic University of Norway.
-
Stien, L., Nilsson, K., Noble, C., Izquierdo-Gomez, D., Ytteborg, E., Timmerhaus, G., & Madaro, A. (2024) Evaluating a crowding intensity scale and welfare indicators for Atlantic salmon in sea cages. Aquaculture Reports.