Filter content
by selecting applicable filters below
Indicator 3.1.2
Requirement
The UoC shall have at least one named member of management who is responsible for the implementation and maintenance of the human rights policy.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
Implementing and maintaining the human rights policy means that the named member of management is responsible for:
-
translating the policy statement into practical actions and initiatives within the UoC and in day-to-day operations
-
monitoring the UoC’s human rights performance, including:
-
identifying areas of improvement
-
reporting progress or issues to senior management or relevant stakeholders
-
overseeing continuous improvement
-
overseeing training and awareness programmes aimed at educating employees and stakeholders about human rights principles, policies, and procedures
-
updating the policy regularly or when there are changes at the UoC.
-
The named member of management should also commit to working with employee representation in the implementation of the policy, ensuring that employees’ views are taken into account.
-
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
records that allow for the verification of the named member of management
-
plan of actions involved in implementing the policy
-
plans for monitoring implementation of the policy
-
evidence of any remediation or corrective actions that have taken place
-
plans for regularly updating and revising the policy.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
that the named member of management understands their responsibilities in implementing and maintaining the policy;
-
that employees are aware of the named member of management responsible for the human rights policy;
-
that the human rights policy is being implemented, which can include checking:
-
progress against any action plans and monitoring plans,
-
if employees are aware of and understand the contents of the policy,
-
evidence of any remediation or corrective actions where there are negative human rights impacts.
-
Indicator 3.1.1
Requirement
The UoC shall have a written human rights policy, approved by senior management, with the intent of publicly demonstrating its commitment to at least the following: – freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; and – the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour; and – the effective abolition of child labour; and – the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation; and – a safe and healthy working environment; and – being a good neighbour and respecting the rights of surrounding communities.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
A human rights policy:
-
is the “company’s public expression of its commitment to meet its responsibility to respect internationally recognized human rights standards”
-
is appropriate to the strategic direction, context and purpose of the organisation
-
provides a framework for setting quality objectives
-
includes an explicit commitment to respect all other internationally recognised human rights standards that apply to people that may be impacted by the UoC’s operations
-
includes stipulations concerning the company’s expectations of personnel, business partners and other relevant parties
-
includes information on how the company will implement its commitment
-
is aligned with the requirements in the ASC Farm Standard, and local and international human rights laws and standards
-
is signed by senior management
-
is understood by all employees.
-
-
Each company will need to determine for itself which human rights may need to be prioritised in its policy because this will depend on the risks associated with the:
-
company’s location
-
type of farming practices
-
composition of the workforce.
-
-
The content of the human rights policy may vary according to the UoC’s size and national legal frameworks, and could also include the following topics:
-
recruitment and termination (see Indicators 3.2.3-3.2.8, 3.3.3-3.3.6, 3.4.1, 3.4.3, 3.4.4, 3.7.1-3.7.4)
-
employee representation (see Indicator 3.1.3)
-
loans and advances (see Indicator 3.2.9)
-
remediation (see Indicators 3.2.2, 3.3.2)
-
anti-discrimination (see Criterion 3.4)
-
training (see Indicators 3.1.4, 3.5.5)
-
freedom of association and collective bargaining (see Criterion 3.6)
-
transparent contracts (see Criterion 3.7)
-
fair wages (see Indicators 3.8.1, 3.8.4, 3.8.5, 3.8.6)
-
working hours (see Criterion 3.9)
-
performance and workplace conduct (see Criterion 3.10)
-
employee accommodation (see Criterion 3.11)
-
grievance mechanisms (see Criterion 3.12)
-
community relations and Indigenous rights (see Criterion 3.13).
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
human rights policy
-
evidence that senior management have signed it off
Auditors Should Confirm
-
that the human rights policy is in place, approved by a member of senior management;
-
where the policy is communicated and available publicly;
-
whether the policy is available to all relevant stakeholders;
-
that the human rights policy is consistent with other company policies and procedures.
Useful Resources
-
Some examples of human rights policies can be found here.
-
United Nations (2011), Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Available at: <https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf>
-
ILO (2022), ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and its Follow-up. Available at: wcms_716594.pdf (ilo.org)
-
International Bill of Human Rights, A Brief History and the two International Covenants. Available at: International Bill of Human Rights | OHCHR
-
United Nations Global Compact (2015), A Guide for Business: How to Develop a Human Rights Policy. Available at: How to Develop a Human Rights Policy 20151013.indd (ohchr.org)
-
OECD (2023), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. Available at: <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/81f92357-en.pdf?expires=1729687419&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=62CA2A98BB5F19532709D450D88B4404>
Indicator 2.11.20
Requirement
The UoC shall clean up waste from the receiving shoreline or land surrounding the site.
Evidence of Implementation
-
Records of regular litter collection activities and the responsible disposal of any items recovered.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
Regular litter collection activities have taken place.
-
Alternatively, conduct a visual inspection to demonstrate low levels of waste are present on the receiving shoreline or land surrounding the site.
Useful Resources
-
Global Ghost Gear Initiative (2021) Best Practice Framework for the Management of Aquaculture Gear. Prepared by Huntington, T. of Poseidon Aquatic Resources Management Ltd. for GGGI. 81 pp. plus appendices: GGGI_Best_Practice_Framework_for_the_Management_of_Aquaculture_Gear.pdf
Indicator 2.11.17
Requirement
The UoC shall adequately maintain machinery, aquaculture gear and infrastructure to minimise performance degradation and failure.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
The site should develop a maintenance plan that identifies the schedule for regular maintenance of machinery, aquaculture gear and infrastructure.
-
The person(s) conducting maintenance should have an adequate level of competence based on the type of maintenance required.
Evidence of Implementation
-
Maintenance plan that identifies the schedule for regular maintenance of machinery, aquaculture gear and infrastructure.
-
Records to demonstrate maintenance was performed according to the schedule outlined in the maintenance plan.
-
Written justification should be in place in cases of deviation from the schedule outlined in the maintenance plan.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The site has a maintenance plan covering regular maintenance of machinery, aquaculture gear and infrastructure.
-
Records that the schedule has been adhered to.
Indicator 2.11.16
Requirement
Indicator 2.11.11
Requirement
Indicator applicability: cage culture in marine/brackish waters using copper nets or copper-treated nets The UoC shall demonstrate that copper levels in the sediment are ≤34 mg Cu/kg dry sediment weight, following the method outlined in Appendix 7 (7.6). An exception applies where copper levels in sediment > 34 mg Cu/kg dry sediment weight, in which case the UoC shall demonstrate that the levels fall within the range of background concentrations measured following the method outlined in Appendix 7 (7.6).
Indicator 2.11.7
Requirement
The UoC shall ensure that all processing effluent is treated to minimise biosecurity and environmental risks.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
An appropriate effluent treatment should be able to eliminate or reduce to acceptable levels the discharge of (amongst others):
-
Organic matter: measured, for example, as the reduction of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) or Total Suspended Solids (TSS) after treatment.
-
Nutrients: measured, for example, as the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorous after treatment.
-
Pathogenic microorganisms: measured, for example, as the reduction of microbial counts after treatment.
-
Oils and greases.
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
An effluent monitoring plan appropriate for the type and amount of processing effluent discharged.
-
Including the parameters, frequency of monitoring and acceptable limits.
-
Analysis results of the parameters included in the effluent monitoring plan.
-
Corrective actions when analysis results exceed acceptable levels.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
Effluent monitoring plan has been developed and implemented.
-
This includes monitoring analysis results.
-
Corrective actions taken when analysis results exceed acceptable levels.
Useful Resources
Indicator 2.11.6
Requirement
Indicator 2.11.3
Requirement
The UoC shall dispose of waste responsibly.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
Sites should identify and classify waste based on where it will be disposed of. This includes the following types of waste:
-
Recyclables: e.g. plastics, metals and paper.
-
Hazardous: e.g. chemicals, batteries and medical waste.
-
Non-recyclable: e.g. biological and non-biological waste
-
-
Based on the classification, sites should determine the facilities to use for waste disposal, for example:
-
Recycling facility.
-
Landfill.
-
Waste management company.
-
Evidence of Implementation
-
Identification and classification of waste.
-
Records confirming that waste is disposed of in appropriate facilities according to its classification and the legality of those facilities.
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The site:
-
Has identified and classified the waste it generates.
-
Uses facilities that are appropriate for the type of waste and that they legally operate.
-
Indicator 2.11.2
Requirement
Indicator applicability: point-source discharge The UoC shall capture non-biological solid waste, including plastics, prior to effluent discharge.
How Do I Interpret This Requirement?
-
Filters or screen barriers installed in the effluent pipe/channel prior to discharge are examples of methods for capturing non-biological solid waste.
-
Based on their context, sites should identify and assess non-biological solid waste that could end up in the effluent to determine the most appropriate method for its capture.
Evidence of Implementation
-
Identification (e.g. a list) of non-biological solid waste generated at the site.
-
An assessment of the characteristics of non-biological solid waste to determine the most appropriate method for capturing it in case it ends up in the effluent.
-
Records of maintenance of the method used to capture non-biological solid waste (if applicable, e.g. filter or screen barriers).
Auditors Should Confirm
-
The site has identified and assessed non-biological solid waste generated.
-
Through site inspection, the method to capture non-biological solid waste prior to effluent discharges and its suitability.
